Cohen v. Cohen

25 N.Y.S. 387, 72 Hun 393, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 463
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 1893·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By section 3251 of the Code, a trial fee is allowed for the trial of an issue either of law or fact By section 964, an issue of law or fact can only arise where an answer, demurrer, or reply has been served. There being no answer, demurrer, or reply, no issue of law or fact was joined in this case. The application to the court was a mere application for judgment, and the court simply took proof to determine whether the plaintiff was entitled to judgment.

[388]*388The plaintiff is not entitled to tax a trial fee or costs after ■notice of trial, no such notice being necessary or proper in the progress of the action. The order appealed from, should be reversed, and the clerk’s taxation affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Cohen, 25 N.Y.S. 387, 72 Hun 393, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 463 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

25 N.Y.S. 387 (Cohen v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelley v. Kelley
123 Misc. 583 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
City Tax Lien Co. v. Murray
91 Misc. 119 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)
Boggess v. Buxton
69 S.E. 367 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1910)
People ex rel. Phœnix Assurance Co. v. O'Donnel
52 Misc. 311 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
State ex rel. Buttz v. Liudahl
91 N.W. 950 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1903)
In re the Final Accounting of Vieu
29 Misc. 161 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)