Cohen v. Cohen

219 A.D.2d 493, 631 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9265
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cohen v. Cohen. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 A.D.2d 411

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered August 3, 1993, which, after a non-jury trial, awarded damages in favor of plaintiff Gyora George Cohen, individually, and against defendant Jess J. Cohen, individually, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court did not err in entering judgment in favor of plaintiff Gyora George Cohen individually, as its decision was grounded in the eighth cause of action of the complaint, breach of contract, and not on a derivative cause of action. Specifically, the individual plaintiff was awarded damages for breach of the parties’ subscription agreement. This duty owed by defendant to plaintiff individually arose independently of any duty owed by defendant to the corporation, and was therefore a proper basis for an individual cause of action. The IAS Court’s credibility determinations are entitled to great deference on appeal and its conclusion that an agreement existed between plaintiff Gyora George Cohen and his brother, defendant Jess J. Cohen, which was breached by defendant, is amply supported by the record. Moreover, in our view, the result below achieved justice between the parties.

We are unpersuaded that the other contentions raised on appeal warrant reversal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Cohen, 219 A.D.2d 493, 631 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9265 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

219 A.D.2d 493 (Cohen v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.