Cohen v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Cohen

9 A.D.2d 675, 192 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6535

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 675 (Cohen v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Cohen, 9 A.D.2d 675, 192 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent, on the ground that the order of June 17, 1959, does not constitute an appealable order. (Oppenheimer v. Duophoto Corp., 271 App. Div. 1005; Brown v. Golden, 6 A D 2d 766; Hall v. Wood, 5 A D 2d 998.) The defendant, if he be so advised, may move to be relieved of the stipulation. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent, on the ground that the order of June 17, 1959, does not constitute an appealable order. (Oppenheimer v. Duophoto Corp., 271 App. Div. 1005; Brown v. Golden, 6 A D 2d 766; Hall v. Wood, 5 A D 2d 998.) The defendant, if he be so advised, may move to be relieved of the stipulation. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 675, 192 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1959.