Cohen v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Cohen

258 A.D. 798, 16 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6997

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 798 (Cohen v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Cohen, 258 A.D. 798, 16 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding instituted in the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York (Family Court), County of Bings, by the petitioner, to obtain an order of support directed against her husband, the responden o below, such an order was duly made and entered directing the husband to pay into that court the sum of thirteen dollars and eighty-five cents “ Semi-monthly, each and every Semi-month ” beginning on May 1, 1939, for the support of the dependent named in the petition, until further order of the court, and containing other provisions. From that order the husband appeals. Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding instituted in the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York (Family Court), County of Bings, by the petitioner, to obtain an order of support directed against her husband, the responden o below, such an order was duly made and entered directing the husband to pay into that court the sum of thirteen dollars and eighty-five cents “ Semi-monthly, each and every Semi-month ” beginning on May 1, 1939, for the support of the dependent named in the petition, until further order of the court, and containing other provisions. From that order the husband appeals. Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 798, 16 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1939.