Cohen v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Florida

Cohen v. Cohen

255 So. 2d 524, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3192

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 8, 1971·No. No. 41162·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court because of conflict with Blanton v. Blanton, 154 Fla. 750, 18 So.2d 902 (1944), and Gibson v. Gibson, 249 So.2d 446 (Fla.App.1st, 1971). We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration [525]*525of the matter, we have determined that there is no conflict and the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and DREW (Retired), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court because of conflict with Blanton v. Blanton, 154 Fla. 750, 18 So.2d 902 (1944), and Gibson v. Gibson, 249 So.2d 446 (Fla.App.1st, 1971). We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration [525]*525of the matter, we have determined that there is no conflict and the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and DREW (Retired), JJ., concur.

Cohen v. Cohen, 255 So. 2d 524, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3192 (Fla. 1971).

Pincite

255 So. 2d 524 (Cohen v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related