Cohen v. Cohen
This text of 255 So. 2d 524 (Cohen v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court because of conflict with Blanton v. Blanton, 154 Fla. 750, 18 So.2d 902 (1944), and Gibson v. Gibson, 249 So.2d 446 (Fla.App.1st, 1971). We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration [525]*525of the matter, we have determined that there is no conflict and the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 So. 2d 524, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-cohen-fla-1971.