Cohen v. City of New York

211 A.D.2d 604, 621 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 855

This text of 211 A.D.2d 604 (Cohen v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 604, 621 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Lerner, J.), entered on or about August 9, 1994, which denied plaintiffs eve-of-trial motion for leave to amend her bill of particulars, and to take the deposition of her medical expert by videotape or stenographic record to be used in lieu of the expert’s in-person testimony at trial, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiff leave to amend her bill of particulars, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs proposal for videotaping or stenographically recording the testimony of her medical report expert would deprive defendant of the opportunity of cross examining the expert at trial, and was properly rejected where the only reason given for the proposal was that the expert was too busy to attend the trial (compare, Hill v Shehan, 154 AD2d 912). We modify to permit the requested amendment to the bill of [605]*605particulars, there being no opposition thereto by defendant. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Sheehan
154 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.D.2d 604, 621 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1995.