Cohen v. City of New York
This text of 72 N.E.2d 11 (Cohen v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event on the following grounds: The description of the scene of the accident, in the notice of claim, was sufficient. The testimony made out a question of fact for the jury as to whether or not the city had been negligent in failing to remove the snow and ice from the crosswalk. No opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dyb and Fuld, JJ. Taking no part: Thacheb, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 N.E.2d 11, 296 N.Y. 814, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1947.