Cohen v. City Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. City Co. of New York

258 A.D. 788, 16 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6917

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1939·Published

Opinion

Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ., concur. Untermyer, J.; I concur in the affirmance. (See Restatement, Restitution, chap. 1, § 5, subd. b; Id. chap. 7, Introductory Note, p. 523.) Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion on the ground that the substance of the action and the nature of the right should determine the question whether the Statute of Limitations is a bar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ., concur. Untermyer, J.; I concur in the affirmance. (See Restatement, Restitution, chap. 1, § 5, subd. b; Id. chap. 7, Introductory Note, p. 523.) Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion on the ground that the substance of the action and the nature of the right should determine the question whether the Statute of Limitations is a bar.

Cohen v. City Co. of New York, 258 A.D. 788, 16 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 788 (Cohen v. City Co. of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.