Cohen v. Cannon

Fourth Circuit

Cohen v. Cannon

357 F. App'x 541

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2009·No. No. 09-7775·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kendall Cohen appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) motion to reconsider its order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants summary judgment on Cohen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Cohen v. Cannon, No. 2:08-cv-03327-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kendall Cohen appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) motion to reconsider its order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants summary judgment on Cohen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Cohen v. Cannon, No. 2:08-cv-03327-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cohen v. Cannon, 357 F. App'x 541 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

357 F. App'x 541 (Cohen v. Cannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related