Cohen v. Beall

68 S.E. 1118, 135 Ga. 134, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 445
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 23, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This ease came before this court upon, a writ of error; and the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Justices Lumpkin, Beck, and Holden being in favor of a reversal, and Chief Justice Eish, Presiding Justice Evans, and Justice Atkinson being- in favor of an affirmative, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below stand affirmed by ' operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Beall, 68 S.E. 1118, 135 Ga. 134, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 445 (Ga. 1910).

68 S.E. 1118 (Cohen v. Beall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Columbia Water Power Co.
74 S.E. 26 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)