Cohen v. Baker
This text of 763 So. 2d 258 (Cohen v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After Remand from the Supreme Court
A portion of this court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Cohen, 763 So.2d 253 (Ala.1999). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the judgment of the trial court ordering the father to pay postminority support is hereby reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court is directed “to determine whether Joshua is able to support himself. If the evidence establishes that he is not, then the trial court must determine whether Joshua’s physical disability is the cause of his inability to support himself. If so, then Joshua is entitled to postminority support, and the trial court should use the child-support [259]*259guidelines to calculate that support, stating its reasons for any deviations from the guidelines.”
REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
763 So. 2d 258, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 138, 2000 WL 218308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-baker-alacivapp-2000.