Cohen v. Ark Asset Holdings, Inc.

268 A.D.2d 285, 701 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 340
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 285 (Cohen v. Ark Asset Holdings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Ark Asset Holdings, Inc., 268 A.D.2d 285, 701 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered July 14, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, in a proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to permit petitioner’s examination of its books, granted respondent’s motion to compel arbitration of the question of whether respondent’s purchase of petitioner’s shares was effective and sufficed to divest petitioner of his status as a shareholder in respondent, and stayed further court proceedings pending completion of the arbitration of that issue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having properly determined that the parties had entered into a valid arbitration agreement, and that the question of whether respondent’s purchase of petitioner’s shares was effec[286]*286tive was arbitrable pursuant to that agreement, the IAS Court’s inquiry was completed and arbitration of the arbitrable issue was properly directed. Where arbitrable and nonarbitrable claims are inextricably interwoven, the proper course is to stay judicial proceedings pending completion of the arbitration, particularly where, as here, the determination of issues in arbitration may well dispose of nonarbitrable matters (see, Marcus v Millwork Trading Co., 208 AD2d 448; Meda Intl. v Salzman, 24 AD2d 710). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Provenance Hotel Partners Fund I, LLC v. GCKC Provenance, LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 00201 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Living Real Estate Group, LLC v. Douglas Elliman, LLC
2023 NY Slip Op 05366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Protostorm, Inc. v. Foley & Lardner LLP
2021 NY Slip Op 02227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Lake Harbor Advisors, LLC v. Settlement Servs. Arbitration & Mediation, Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 6073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Harper Investments, Inc. v. Harper-Kilgore, LLC
95 A.D.3d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Anderson Street Realty Corp. v. New Rochelle Revitalization, LLC
78 A.D.3d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
County Glass & Metal Installers, Inc. v. Pavarini McGovern, LLC
65 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
All Metro Health Care Services, Inc. v. Edwards
25 Misc. 3d 863 (New York Supreme Court, 2009)
In re the Arbitration between Colonial Cooperative Insurance & Muehlbauer
46 A.D.3d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
RAD Ventures Corp. v. Gotthilf
6 A.D.3d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 285, 701 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-ark-asset-holdings-inc-nyappdiv-2000.