Cohen v. Ark Asset Holdings, Inc.
This text of 268 A.D.2d 285 (Cohen v. Ark Asset Holdings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered July 14, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, in a proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to permit petitioner’s examination of its books, granted respondent’s motion to compel arbitration of the question of whether respondent’s purchase of petitioner’s shares was effective and sufficed to divest petitioner of his status as a shareholder in respondent, and stayed further court proceedings pending completion of the arbitration of that issue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Having properly determined that the parties had entered into a valid arbitration agreement, and that the question of whether respondent’s purchase of petitioner’s shares was effec[286]*286tive was arbitrable pursuant to that agreement, the IAS Court’s inquiry was completed and arbitration of the arbitrable issue was properly directed. Where arbitrable and nonarbitrable claims are inextricably interwoven, the proper course is to stay judicial proceedings pending completion of the arbitration, particularly where, as here, the determination of issues in arbitration may well dispose of nonarbitrable matters (see, Marcus v Millwork Trading Co., 208 AD2d 448; Meda Intl. v Salzman, 24 AD2d 710). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D.2d 285, 701 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-ark-asset-holdings-inc-nyappdiv-2000.