Cohen v. . American Surety Company of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Cohen v. . American Surety Company of New York

91 N.E. 1113, 197 N.Y. 547, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1119

DecidedJanuary 4, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 91 N.E. 1113 (Cohen v. . American Surety Company of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. . American Surety Company of New York, 91 N.E. 1113, 197 N.Y. 547, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1119 (N.Y. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

*548 Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of our previous decision in the same ease. (192 N. Y. 227.) The proof now establishes that the defendant had notice of the taking of the assignee’s account in the United States District Court, and was given an opportunity to be heard therein, by the service of a summons of the special commissioner appointed by that court to take and state the account, which was sufficient of itself, or, even, within the rules of practice applicable to such proceedings in the Federal courts. (See Gen. Order in Bankruptcy, No. 37, and Rules of Practice for the Courts of Equity of the United States, Nos. 74 and 75.)

Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*548 Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of our previous decision in the same ease. (192 N. Y. 227.) The proof now establishes that the defendant had notice of the taking of the assignee’s account in the United States District Court, and was given an opportunity to be heard therein, by the service of a summons of the special commissioner appointed by that court to take and state the account, which was sufficient of itself, or, even, within the rules of practice applicable to such proceedings in the Federal courts. (See Gen. Order in Bankruptcy, No. 37, and Rules of Practice for the Courts of Equity of the United States, Nos. 74 and 75.)

Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 N.E. 1113, 197 N.Y. 547, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-american-surety-company-of-new-york-ny-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack