Cohen & Co. v. Candler

14 S.E. 193, 88 Ga. 207, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 330
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 28, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed.

A distress warrant in favor of Candler against W. J. and Sarah. B. Fletcher, returnable to a justice’s court, was levied upon certain property which was claimed by Cohen & Company. The case was taken by appeal to the superior coui't, and a verdict returned finding the property subject. Claimants’ motion for new trial was overruled, and they excepted. Among the grounds of the motion were, that the court erred in overruling the motion of claimant, to dismiss the levy of the distress warrant, upon the ground that the affidavit (see headnote 2) upon which it was based failed to disclose any jurisdictional fact that would authorize the issuing of it; and in admitting in evidence the distress warrant, affidavit and levy, over objection that the affidavit failed to show upon its face any jurisdictional fact.

EL EL Dean and M. L. Smith, contra,

cited Code, §§4377, 4386, 4082, 3461; “Occupier,” Rapalje, Webster; 40 Ga. 511, 516, 520; 56 Ga. 11; 79 Ga. 427; 20 Ga. 379; 28 Ga. 543; 85 Ga. 687.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen & Co. v. Candler, 14 S.E. 193, 88 Ga. 207, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 330 (Ga. 1891).

14 S.E. 193 (Cohen & Co. v. Candler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimball Co. v. Rogers
93 S.E. 32 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)