Cohea v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 28, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2012-1622·Published

Opinion

FILED

$EP 2 8 2012

C|erk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT coURT ¢,,um,,,,,,,, D,St,,c,,,, c°,u,,,b,,

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Danny J ames Cohea, ) Plaintiff, l v. § Civil Action No. United States of America et al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19l5A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner’s complaint upon a determination that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted).

Plaintiff is a Califomia state prisoner incarcerated in Corcoran, Califomia. He sues the United States, former President William Jefferson Clinton, the 104“‘ Congress, and a list of federal district and appellate judges in the Ninth Circuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Since by its terms § 1983 applies only to state actors, which the named defendants are not, and a liberal reading of the complaint’s allegations reveals no basis for construing the complaint against the individual defendants as brought under Bz`vens v. Six Unknown Namea' Agents of F ederal Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (l97l), this case will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies

§i/Qr d floyd

United States District Judge

this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: September ,2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohea v. United States of America, (D.D.C. 2012).

Cohea v. United States of America (Cohea v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related