Cohea v. California

Supreme Court

Cohea v. California

541 U.S. 970, 124 S. Ct. 1886

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 5, 2004·No. 03-8771·Published

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed *971 not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed *971 not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Cohea v. California, 541 U.S. 970, 124 S. Ct. 1886 (2004).

Pincite

541 U.S. 970 (Cohea v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related