Cohara v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Cohara v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

790 N.E.2d 1207, 99 Ohio St. 3d 236

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 16, 2003

DocketNo. 2002-0903

StatusPublished

This text of 790 N.E.2d 1207 (Cohara v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohara v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 790 N.E.2d 1207, 99 Ohio St. 3d 236 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Lazarus, J., dissents. Cynthia A. Lazarus, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J. Stage & Michelson Co., L.P.A., Michael B. Michelson and Andrew J. Thompson, for appellant. Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Sheila A. McKeon, Timothy J. Fitzgerald and Richard J. Seislowski, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Lazarus, J., dissents. Cynthia A. Lazarus, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J. Stage & Michelson Co., L.P.A., Michael B. Michelson and Andrew J. Thompson, for appellant. Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Sheila A. McKeon, Timothy J. Fitzgerald and Richard J. Seislowski, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

790 N.E.2d 1207, 99 Ohio St. 3d 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohara-v-consolidated-rail-corp-ohio-2003.