Cohan v. Milano
434 N.E.2d 259, 55 N.Y.2d 926, 449 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3118
Opinions
OPINION of the court
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division insofar as it was there concluded that there was no duty owed to plaintiffs by defendant-respondent, nor any breach of an asserted duty (79 AD2d 579).
Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler and Meyer. Chief Judge Cooke dissents and votes to reverse in [928]*928a separate opinion in which Judge Fuchsberg concurs. Taking no part: Judge Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cohan v. Milano, 434 N.E.2d 259, 55 N.Y.2d 926, 449 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3118 (N.Y. 1982).
434 N.E.2d 259 (Cohan v. Milano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Revesz v. Carey
86 A.D.3d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Duncan v. Hillebrandt
239 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Pizzola v. State
130 A.D.2d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Benjamin v. City of New York
99 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)