Home/New York Court of Appeals/Cohan v. Milano

Cohan v. Milano

434 N.E.2d 259, 55 N.Y.2d 926, 449 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3118
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 11, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 434 N.E.2d 259 (Cohan v. Milano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohan v. Milano, 434 N.E.2d 259, 55 N.Y.2d 926, 449 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3118 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinions

OPINION of the court

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division insofar as it was there concluded that there was no duty owed to plaintiffs by defendant-respondent, nor any breach of an asserted duty (79 AD2d 579).

Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler and Meyer. Chief Judge Cooke dissents and votes to reverse in [928]*928a separate opinion in which Judge Fuchsberg concurs. Taking no part: Judge Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Revesz v. Carey
86 A.D.3d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Duncan v. Hillebrandt
239 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Pizzola v. State
130 A.D.2d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Benjamin v. City of New York
99 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 N.E.2d 259, 55 N.Y.2d 926, 449 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohan-v-milano-ny-1982.