Cohan v. Cohan

458 So. 2d 405, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2336, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15794
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1984·No. No. 83-2719·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant/wife’s contention that the trial court erred in receiving ex parte evidence affecting her duties as a custodial parent. We, therefore, strike paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order since there is no competent evidence to support them. See In the Interest of Brown, 246 So.2d 166 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).

The order in all other respects is affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohan v. Cohan, 458 So. 2d 405, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2336, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15794 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 405 (Cohan v. Cohan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State, Department of Transportation v. Borsje
566 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)