Cogswell v. Whittlesey
1 Root 384
Opinion
Judgment — That the rejoinder is insufficient; the defendants are concluded by the settlement, and by their not exhibiting their claim within, the time limited by the Court of Probate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cogswell v. Whittlesey, 1 Root 384 (Colo. 1792).
1 Root 384 (Cogswell v. Whittlesey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCormick v. Interstate Consolidated Rapid Transit Railway Co.
55 S.W. 252 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Pickel v. St. Louis Chamber of Commerce Ass'n
10 Mo. App. 191 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1881)
Pipes v. Norton
47 Miss. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Martin v. Beckwith
4 Wis. 219 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1856)