Cogswell v. Whittlesey
1 Root 384
This text of 1 Root 384 (Cogswell v. Whittlesey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cogswell v. Whittlesey, 1 Root 384 (Colo. 1792).
Opinion
Judgment — That the rejoinder is insufficient; the defendants are concluded by the settlement, and by their not exhibiting their claim within, the time limited by the Court of Probate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCormick v. Interstate Consolidated Rapid Transit Railway Co.
55 S.W. 252 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Pickel v. St. Louis Chamber of Commerce Ass'n
10 Mo. App. 191 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1881)
Pipes v. Norton
47 Miss. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Martin v. Beckwith
4 Wis. 219 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1856)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cogswell-v-whittlesey-conn-1792.