Cogswell v. Wheaton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Cogswell v. Wheaton

1 Root 458

DecidedAugust 15, 1792

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 458 (Cogswell v. Wheaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cogswell v. Wheaton, 1 Root 458 (Colo. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

In the County Court the defendant changing plead not guilty; and the cause was tried on that issue, and appealed to this court, and closed to the jury; this being discovered by the court upon reading the files, after the jury were impaneledj the cause was ordered to be erased from the docket, as not being properly before this court. See the ease of Durkee v. Varnum, Windham, March Term, A. D. 1792, and the case of Sweet v. Dow, New London, March Term, A. D. 1792.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the County Court the defendant changing plead not guilty; and the cause was tried on that issue, and appealed to this court, and closed to the jury; this being discovered by the court upon reading the files, after the jury were impaneledj the cause was ordered to be erased from the docket, as not being properly before this court. See the ease of Durkee v. Varnum, Windham, March Term, A. D. 1792, and the case of Sweet v. Dow, New London, March Term, A. D. 1792.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cogswell-v-wheaton-conn-1792.