Cogmon (Cecil) v. State
This text of Cogmon (Cecil) v. State (Cogmon (Cecil) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
had not been filed. In fact he claimed that counsel specifically refused to file the appeal. Further, it is clear from the record that appellant did not believe an appeal was pending because on February 5, 2011, appellant filed a motion for counsel to withdraw and a motion for the production of documents from his former counsel. We note that these motions were filed six months before the expiration of the one-year time limit for filing a timely post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the petition as procedurally barred, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
j,
2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1 ,147A e cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge Cecil Cogmon Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) I947A e>
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cogmon (Cecil) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cogmon-cecil-v-state-nev-2014.