Coggins v. State
This text of 296 S.E.2d 362 (Coggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals his convictions on three counts of mutiny in a penal institution. Held:
1. There is no indication that any of the prospective jurors had formed fixed opinions as to the defendant’s guilt or innocence; and, consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for change in venue. See Coleman v. State, 237 Ga. 84, 90 (226 SE2d 911) (1976); Baker v. State, 245 Ga. 657, 659 (2) (266 SE2d 477) (1980).
2. The evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 310 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 S.E.2d 362, 163 Ga. App. 829, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coggins-v-state-gactapp-1982.