Coggins v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Coggins v. State

108 So. 2d 188, 40 Ala. App. 105

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 6, 1959

Docket7 Div. 542

StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 2d 188 (Coggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coggins v. State, 108 So. 2d 188, 40 Ala. App. 105 (Ala. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

On 11 March 1958 this appellant was adjudged guilty of possession of a still, and on that day gave notice of appeal.

No motion for a new trial was filed.

The transcript of the evidence was filed with the circuit clerk on 16 May 1958, more than sixty days from the date of the notice of appeal.

No extension of time for filing the transcript of the evidence was applied for in the court below.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to strike the transcript of the evidence because not timely filed with the clerk below.

The motion of the Attorney General is well taken and is hereby granted. Clark v. State, 38 Ala.App. 305, 82 So.2d 805; Eidson v. State, 38 Ala.App. 321, 82 So.2d 814; Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d 216.

The record proper is in all things regular.

This judgment is therefore due to be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI