Coggeshall v. McGrath
89 N.Y.S. 334
Opinion
The defendant did not become ipso facto, by his notice of withdrawal, a creditor of the company for the withdrawal value of his shares (or, as the case would be here, for the excess thereof over his indebtedness to the company on his note), so as to exempt" his shares from their proportionate share of the general debts of the company. Vinton v. Building & Loan Ass’n (Ky.) 66 S. W. 510; Cobb v. Johnson, 35 Misc. Rep. 109, 71 N. Y. Supp. 218.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coggeshall v. McGrath, 89 N.Y.S. 334 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1903).
89 N.Y.S. 334 (Coggeshall v. McGrath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cobb v. Johnson
35 Misc. 109 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
Vinton v. National Building & Loan Ass'n
66 S.W. 510 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1902)