Coggburn v. Watts

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coggburn v. Watts

540 S.W.2d 186, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2173

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 10, 1976·No. No. 10283·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On December 18, 1975, a Taney County jury returned a unanimous verdict denying plaintiffs’ claims for personal injuries, loss of consortium, and property damage. All documents after the return of the verdict and before the February 9, 1976, notice of appeal relate to after-trial motions.

The transcript does not contain a judgment as defined by Rule 74.01, V.A.M.R. and required by Rule 81.14(a), V.A.M.R. Insofar as this court’s records are concerned, judgment has not been entered on the jury verdict. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction of this premature appeal and it is dismissed. Peacock v. City of Dexter, 530 S.W.2d 272 (Mo.App.1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On December 18, 1975, a Taney County jury returned a unanimous verdict denying plaintiffs’ claims for personal injuries, loss of consortium, and property damage. All documents after the return of the verdict and before the February 9, 1976, notice of appeal relate to after-trial motions.

The transcript does not contain a judgment as defined by Rule 74.01, V.A.M.R. and required by Rule 81.14(a), V.A.M.R. Insofar as this court’s records are concerned, judgment has not been entered on the jury verdict. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction of this premature appeal and it is dismissed. Peacock v. City of Dexter, 530 S.W.2d 272 (Mo.App.1975).

Coggburn v. Watts, 540 S.W.2d 186, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2173 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

540 S.W.2d 186 (Coggburn v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related