Cogdell v. . Barfield
9 N.C. 332
Opinion
The affidavits show that there is no ground on which the Court could grant a new trial. The Defendant Barfield, neglected the case from the beginning, on very insufficient reasons, whereby a default was taken against him ; and afterwards on the trial, in - curred the risk of a counsel’s attendance who did not practise in the Court, while he was told of others that would be in attendance. To award a new trial for the reasons here offered, were to encourage inattention, and promote litigation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cogdell v. . Barfield, 9 N.C. 332 (N.C. 1823).
9 N.C. 332 (Cogdell v. . Barfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sutherland v. . McLean
154 S.E. 662 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Andrews v. . Devane
3 N.C. 373 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1805)