Cogburn v. State

193 S.W. 1066, 81 Tex. Crim. 108, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 70
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 28, 1917
DocketNo. 4410.
StatusPublished

This text of 193 S.W. 1066 (Cogburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cogburn v. State, 193 S.W. 1066, 81 Tex. Crim. 108, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 70 (Tex. 1917).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and prosecutes an appeal.

After the adjournment of the term of court at-which the conviction occurred appellant entered into an appeal bond to this court instead of a recognizance. The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss the appeal because of the want of a recognizance. We are of opinion that this motion should be sustained, as it is not shown by this record that appellant is in jail and has been since the conviction or notice of appeal.

The motion will be sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.W. 1066, 81 Tex. Crim. 108, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cogburn-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.