Cogar v. Meinrath

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cogar v. Meinrath

93 A.D.2d 998, 461 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17920

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.2d 998 (Cogar v. Meinrath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cogar v. Meinrath, 93 A.D.2d 998, 461 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Contrary to the argument made by plaintiff on the appeal, there is no suggestion in the moving affidavits that defendant was, at the time of the service of the summons, engaged in “a continuous and systematic course of ‘doing business’ here” rendering him subject to personal service under CPLR 301 (Laufer v Ostrow, 55 NY2d 305, 309-310). Special Term, therefore, properly dismissed the complaint without an evidentiary hearing. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Lynch, J. — dismiss complaint, lack of personal jurisdiction.) Present ■— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Contrary to the argument made by plaintiff on the appeal, there is no suggestion in the moving affidavits that defendant was, at the time of the service of the summons, engaged in “a continuous and systematic course of ‘doing business’ here” rendering him subject to personal service under CPLR 301 (Laufer v Ostrow, 55 NY2d 305, 309-310). Special Term, therefore, properly dismissed the complaint without an evidentiary hearing. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Lynch, J. — dismiss complaint, lack of personal jurisdiction.) Present ■— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.2d 998, 461 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cogar-v-meinrath-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack