Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.
859 A.2d 568, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 377
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 2004
DocketSC 17256
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 859 A.2d 568 (Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp., 859 A.2d 568, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 377 (Colo. 2004).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 843 (AC 24131), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 52-593 did not apply to save the plaintiffs cause of action?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.
882 A.2d 597 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
859 A.2d 568, 271 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cogan-v-chase-manhattan-auto-financial-corp-conn-2004.