Cofield v. E. A. Jenkins Motor Co.

71 S.E. 969, 89 S.C. 419, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 276
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 1, 1911·No. 7994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

‘The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

For valuable consideration, defendant gave plaintiff the exclusive agency to sell its motor cars in a certain territory for a specified time, and agreed to allow him a discount of ten per cent, from the catalogue prices on all cars sold. During the life of the contract, defendant, knowing that it was acting in violation of its terms, sold four cars in plaintiff’s territory worth, at catalogue prices, $5,300.00. Held, in an action for breach of the contract, that the measure of plaintiff’s damages was ten per cent, of the catalogue prices of the cars so sold by defendant.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Woods did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cofield v. E. A. Jenkins Motor Co., 71 S.E. 969, 89 S.C. 419, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 276 (S.C. 1911).

71 S.E. 969 (Cofield v. E. A. Jenkins Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis-Hale Coal Co. v. Enterprise Fuel Co.
33 F.2d 727 (Fourth Circuit, 1929)
Hutson v. Stone
112 S.E. 39 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)