Coffman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 16, 2005·No. 2004-2087·Published

Opinion

In Quo Warranto. On motions to dismiss, motion for sanctions for frivolous action, and motions for stay. Motions to dismiss sustained. Motion for sanctions denied. Motions for stay dismissed as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coffman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436 (Ohio 2005).

822 N.E.2d 808 (Coffman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.