Coffman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 16, 2005
Docket2004-2087
StatusPublished

This text of 822 N.E.2d 808 (Coffman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

In Quo Warranto. On motions to dismiss, motion for sanctions for frivolous action, and motions for stay. Motions to dismiss sustained. Motion for sanctions denied. Motions for stay dismissed as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-v-toyota-motor-credit-corp-ohio-2005.