Coffman v. State

103 S.W. 1128, 51 Tex. Crim. 478, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 182
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 22, 1907
DocketNo. 3497.
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 103 S.W. 1128 (Coffman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffman v. State, 103 S.W. 1128, 51 Tex. Crim. 478, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 182 (Tex. 1907).

Opinion

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree, and his punishment assessed at twenty years confinement in the penitentiary; and prosecutes this appeal.

This is a case of circumstantial evidence, the theory of the State . being that Ben Coffman, appellant’s son, committed the homicide by lying in wait for deceased Wilson, and that appellant was present at the time aiding and abetting in the homicide. The defendant relied on the weakness of the State’s case, and also introduced evidence of an alibi.

A summary of the facts, on the part of the State, shows that the homicide occurred in the country some seven miles north of Jefferson in Marion County. Appellant, John Coffman, owned a farm, and lived with his family at the Coffman residence on his farm; his family consisted of himself, his son Ben Coffman, who was about 21 years of age, a younger son about 15 or 16 years old, named Bawney, and a daughter Fredonia, and another son, Warren, who was absent at the time in West Texas. On the farm south of appellant’s place deceased J. S. Wilson lived with his family; he was a tenant of appellant, and had been since about the first of January, this homicide occurring on the 24th of March, 1905. Wilson’s family consisted of himself, his wife, his son Billy Wilson, a daughter, named Susie Wilson, and a young daughter about 12 years old, named Pearl Wilson. About the 7th of March appellant’s son Warren married deceased Wilson’s daughter Madgie; they lived together at appellant’s house about one week when Warren Coffman suddenly disappeared; his wife immediately returned to the deceased Wilson’s home where she was residing at the .time of the homicide. Up to the time of Warren’s separation from his wife the relations of the families (appellanPs and deceased’s), appeared to have been friendly. The homicide itself seems to have grown out of this separation. There is some testimony from the State’s witnesses tending to show that appellant made some remarks in regard to Mrs. Madgie Coffman, his son’s wife, after Warren had left her, in the neighborhood; this appellant denied. Inasmuch as the State’s case mainly depends on the locus of the homicide, and the situation of the various places connected therewith, a plot was introduced in evidence, a copy of which is here inserted:

*481

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garza v. State
194 S.W.2d 406 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Hill v. State
121 S.W.2d 996 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Seals v. State
73 S.W.2d 528 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Powell v. State
21 S.W.2d 728 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Crouchette v. State
271 S.W. 99 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Crouchett v. State
271 S.W. 99 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Rowan v. State
260 S.W. 591 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Burks v. State
260 S.W. 181 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
McCue v. State
170 S.W. 280 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Perry v. State
155 S.W. 263 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Coffman v. State
119 S.W. 1148 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.W. 1128, 51 Tex. Crim. 478, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-v-state-texcrimapp-1907.