Coffman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coffman v. State

471 S.W.3d 403, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1002, 2015 WL 5823988

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 2015·No. No. ED 101802·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Coffman appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Coffman appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Coffman v. State, 471 S.W.3d 403, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1002, 2015 WL 5823988 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

471 S.W.3d 403 (Coffman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.