Coffman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coffman v. State

471 S.W.3d 403, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1002, 2015 WL 5823988

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 6, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101802

StatusPublished

This text of 471 S.W.3d 403 (Coffman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coffman v. State, 471 S.W.3d 403, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1002, 2015 WL 5823988 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Coffman appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Coffman appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 S.W.3d 403, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1002, 2015 WL 5823988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-v-state-moctapp-2015.