Coffman v. State

330 S.W.3d 767, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1503, 2010 WL 4449094
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 2010·No. WD 71466·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Coffman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Coffman contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in: (1) failing to call police officer Joseph Jackson as a witness at trial; (2) failing to call Goldina McKnight and Dr. Steven Scott to testify at trial; (3) failing to call criminalist Shawn Bailes as a witness at trial; and (4) conceding in closing argument that the victim had not consented to sexual intercourse with Coffman. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coffman v. State, 330 S.W.3d 767, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1503, 2010 WL 4449094 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

330 S.W.3d 767 (Coffman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamar Co., LLC v. City of Kansas City
330 S.W.3d 767 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)