Coffman v. State
This text of 330 S.W.3d 767 (Coffman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Daniel Coffman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Coffman contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in: (1) failing to call police officer Joseph Jackson as a witness at trial; (2) failing to call Goldina McKnight and Dr. Steven Scott to testify at trial; (3) failing to call criminalist Shawn Bailes as a witness at trial; and (4) conceding in closing argument that the victim had not consented to sexual intercourse with Coffman. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
330 S.W.3d 767, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1503, 2010 WL 4449094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-v-state-moctapp-2010.