Coffman v. Sheriff

529 P.2d 207, 90 Nev. 461, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 431
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 1974·No. No. 7820·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. At this juncture we need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973).

Other contentions raised by appellant are also without merit. Cf. Laney v. State, 86 Nev. 173, 466 P.2d 666 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coffman v. Sheriff, 529 P.2d 207, 90 Nev. 461, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 431 (Neb. 1974).

529 P.2d 207 (Coffman v. Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. Sheriff of Carson City
512 P.2d 774 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
Laney v. State
466 P.2d 666 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1970)