Coffman v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Coffman v. Sheriff

529 P.2d 207, 90 Nev. 461, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 431

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 27, 1974

DocketNo. 7820

StatusPublished

This text of 529 P.2d 207 (Coffman v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coffman v. Sheriff, 529 P.2d 207, 90 Nev. 461, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 431 (Neb. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. At this juncture we need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973).

Other contentions raised by appellant are also without merit. Cf. Laney v. State, 86 Nev. 173, 466 P.2d 666 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. At this juncture we need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973).

Other contentions raised by appellant are also without merit. Cf. Laney v. State, 86 Nev. 173, 466 P.2d 666 (1970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 P.2d 207, 90 Nev. 461, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-v-sheriff-nev-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack