Coffman v. Sheriff
529 P.2d 207, 90 Nev. 461, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 431
Opinion
OPINION
In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. At this juncture we need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973).
Other contentions raised by appellant are also without merit. Cf. Laney v. State, 86 Nev. 173, 466 P.2d 666 (1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coffman v. Sheriff, 529 P.2d 207, 90 Nev. 461, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 431 (Neb. 1974).
529 P.2d 207 (Coffman v. Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McDonald v. Sheriff of Carson City
512 P.2d 774 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
Laney v. State
466 P.2d 666 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1970)