Coffman v. B.T.O. Diner Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coffman v. B.T.O. Diner Corp.

34 A.D.2d 789, 311 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 789 (Coffman v. B.T.O. Diner Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coffman v. B.T.O. Diner Corp., 34 A.D.2d 789, 311 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

—■ Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 24, 1969, which denied a motion by appellants for reargument of their prior motion to consolidate two arbitration proceedings and to appoint an arbitrator or arbitrators. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (Matter of Foglia, 32 A D 2d 836). We have nevertheless examined the merits and, were the appeal properly before us, we would affirm the order (Kushlin v. Bialer, 32 A D 2d 217, 218). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—■ Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 24, 1969, which denied a motion by appellants for reargument of their prior motion to consolidate two arbitration proceedings and to appoint an arbitrator or arbitrators. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (Matter of Foglia, 32 A D 2d 836). We have nevertheless examined the merits and, were the appeal properly before us, we would affirm the order (Kushlin v. Bialer, 32 A D 2d 217, 218). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 789, 311 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-v-bto-diner-corp-nyappdiv-1970.