Coffman v. Bartsch

25 Ind. 201
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 Ind. 201 (Coffman v. Bartsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffman v. Bartsch, 25 Ind. 201 (Ind. 1865).

Opinion

Ray, J.

The only question involved in this appeal has already been fully determined by this court, in the cases of Smith v. Smith, 23 Ind. 202, and McMackin v. Michaels, id., 462. It was there held that “those ohly who were of the blood of the ancestor last seized could inherit.” In the case under consideration, the Coffman children are of the blood of the ancestor last seized, and are entitled to inherit equally with the children by her second husband. The appellants attempt to apply sec. 6 of the law of descents, 1 G. & H. 292, as controlling, but that section governs the inheritance only as between kindred of the whole blood and kindred of the half blood. Here the children by whom the inheritance is claimed are all of the whole blood of the ancestor last seized, and that section can have no application to the case.

6r. A. Johnson and L. Bevelin, for appellants. M. Wilson and J. B. Julian, for appellees.

The demurrer to the complaint should have been overruled.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. Costs against the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClanahan v. Trafford
46 Ind. 410 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Barnes v. Loyd
37 Ind. 523 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ind. 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-v-bartsch-ind-1865.