Coffman & Richardson v. Russell

4 Munf. 207, 18 Va. 207, 1814 Va. LEXIS 25
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedFebruary 23, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 207 (Coffman & Richardson v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffman & Richardson v. Russell, 4 Munf. 207, 18 Va. 207, 1814 Va. LEXIS 25 (Va. 1814).

Opinion

Judge Roane

reported the court’s opinion, as follows :

“ The court, (not deciding that it was correct in the county court, in the lirst action, after a verdict had been found for the defendants, and a new trial granted on condition of the payment of costs by the plaintiff, (which condition not having been complied with by him, the verdict is supposed to have remained in full force,) to permit the plaintiff, under those circumstances, to dismiss his cause, and to render judgment for the costs, only, instead of a judgment upon that verdict for the defendants,) is of opinion, that, such dismission having been in fact made, by a judgment which is in full force and unreversed, and no judgment having been rendered for the defendants upon the verdict, the dis-mission and judgment aforesaid form no bar to the present action; and that there is no error in the judgment of the .superior court, which is therefore affirmed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Browning v. Browning
112 S.E. 314 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1922)
Toney v. Sandy Ridge Coal & Coke Co.
99 S.E. 178 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1919)
Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corp. v. Oliver Refining Co.
69 S.E. 958 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1911)
Staunton Mutual Telephone Co. v. Buchanan
62 S.E. 928 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1908)
Tate v. Bank of New York
32 S.E. 476 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1899)
Muse v. Farmers Bank
27 Va. 252 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Hoover v. Mitchell
25 Va. 387 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1874)
Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'r
7 Gratt. 425 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1851)
Hoffman v. Porter
12 F. Cas. 304 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia, 1824)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Munf. 207, 18 Va. 207, 1814 Va. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffman-richardson-v-russell-va-1814.