Coffing v. Tripp

1 How. Pr. 115
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beakdsley, Justice.

Thought there could no precedent be found for allowing the plaintiff to amend, by substantially changing a party to the suit, under such circumstances. The proper way for plaintiff would be, to discontinue the suit and commence anew.

Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coffing v. Tripp, 1 How. Pr. 115 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

1 How. Pr. 115 (Coffing v. Tripp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Syckels v. Perry
3 Rob. 621 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1864)