Coffing v. Tripp
1 How. Pr. 115
This text of 1 How. Pr. 115 (Coffing v. Tripp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coffing v. Tripp, 1 How. Pr. 115 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Thought there could no precedent be found for allowing the plaintiff to amend, by substantially changing a party to the suit, under such circumstances. The proper way for plaintiff would be, to discontinue the suit and commence anew.
Motion denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Syckels v. Perry
3 Rob. 621 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1864)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffing-v-tripp-nysupct-1845.