Coffin v. Atkins
This text of 13 N.Y.S. 886 (Coffin v. Atkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment. The covenant in the deed of July, 1884, reads that the plaintiff will “supply the steam for heating and the hot water for the adjoining buildings on the east of the premises hereby conveyed, as now connected. ” The word “now” refers to the time of the delivery of the deed. To establish his case it became necessary for the plaintiff to show, among other things, that the supply of the steam and hot water to the premises in question was as they were connected at the time of the delivery of the deed. This he failed to do. The complaint was therefore properly dismissed. The judgment should be affirmed.
Sedgwick, 0. J., concurs in the result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 N.Y.S. 886, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffin-v-atkins-superctny-1891.