Coffey v. United States
455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10500
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 27, 1972·No. Nos. 71-1858, 71-1859·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
The facts of the case may be found in the decision of the district court in Coffey v. United States (D.C.S.D.Cal., 1971) 324 F.Supp. 1087. It is clear that Coffey was acting incident to military service.
The order of the district court granting a motion for summary judgment in behalf of the United States, appellee, is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coffey v. United States, 455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10500 (9th Cir. 1972).
455 F.2d 1380 (Coffey v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schoenfeld v. Quamme
492 F.3d 1016 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Stephen P. Lauer v. United States
968 F.2d 1428 (First Circuit, 1992)
Lauer v. United States
First Circuit, 1992
Hinkie v. United States
524 F. Supp. 277 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Kessler v. United States
514 F. Supp. 1320 (D. South Carolina, 1981)
In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation
506 F. Supp. 762 (E.D. New York, 1980)
Bryson v. United States
463 F. Supp. 908 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
Mark E. Mason v. United States
568 F.2d 1135 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Camassar v. United States
400 F. Supp. 894 (D. Connecticut, 1975)