Coffey v. United States

455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10500
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 1972
DocketNos. 71-1858, 71-1859
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 455 F.2d 1380 (Coffey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffey v. United States, 455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10500 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The facts of the case may be found in the decision of the district court in Coffey v. United States (D.C.S.D.Cal., 1971) 324 F.Supp. 1087. It is clear that Coffey was acting incident to military service.

The order of the district court granting a motion for summary judgment in behalf of the United States, appellee, is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schoenfeld v. Quamme
492 F.3d 1016 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Stephen P. Lauer v. United States
968 F.2d 1428 (First Circuit, 1992)
Lauer v. United States
First Circuit, 1992
Hinkie v. United States
524 F. Supp. 277 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Kessler v. United States
514 F. Supp. 1320 (D. South Carolina, 1981)
In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation
506 F. Supp. 762 (E.D. New York, 1980)
Bryson v. United States
463 F. Supp. 908 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
Mark E. Mason v. United States
568 F.2d 1135 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Camassar v. United States
400 F. Supp. 894 (D. Connecticut, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffey-v-united-states-ca9-1972.