Coffey v. Joy
449 N.E.2d 1275, 59 N.Y.2d 643, 463 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3044
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 923).
[645]*645Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coffey v. Joy, 449 N.E.2d 1275, 59 N.Y.2d 643, 463 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3044 (N.Y. 1983).
449 N.E.2d 1275 (Coffey v. Joy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Licari v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
245 A.D.2d 159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Hawkes v. Bennett
155 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)