Coffey v. Collier
This text of 12 Ind. 565 (Coffey v. Collier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Coffey sued Richard and Joel Collier before a justice of the peace, upon a promissory note for the payment of 22 dollars. The justice gave judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed. In the Common Pleas, they moved to dismiss the cause, on the ground that the plaintiff had not, when he commenced his suit before the justice (he being a non-resident of the county in which it was commenced), given security for costs. Pending this motion, the plaintiff offered to give such security; but his offer was refused. The defendants’ motion was sustained, and the cause dismissed, &c.
The code says, justices shall require security for costs from plaintiffs living out of the county. 2 F. S. p. 460, § 55. But here, the record, though it shows that the defendants appeared before the justice, and contested the plaintiff’s suit, fails tó show that they even suggested his [566]*566non-residency. And the defendants having appealed, the cause must be considered in the Common Pleas de novo. And the result is, that security for costs could not be required in that Court, unless the plaintiff was a non-resident of the state. Id. pp. 127, 463, §§ 402, 67.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ind. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffey-v-collier-ind-1859.