Coffey v. Coffey
This text of 391 S.E.2d 40 (Coffey v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action by a parent against her child for personal injuries received while she was a passenger in an automobile operated by the child. At the time of the accident the child was an unemancipated minor, but at the time of suit he had reached his majority. The Court of Appeals in a reasoned opinion by Judge Greene, concurred in by Judges Arnold and Lewis, concluded that the doctrine of parent-child immunity barred the suit and affirmed summary judgment entered for defendant in the Superior Court.1
After carefully considering the briefs and arguments of counsel, we have determined that we improvidently allowed plaintiff’s petition for further review.
Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 S.E.2d 40, 326 N.C. 586, 1990 N.C. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffey-v-coffey-nc-1990.