Coffey v. Coffey

391 S.E.2d 40, 326 N.C. 586, 1990 N.C. LEXIS 234
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 10, 1990
DocketNo. 359PA89
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 391 S.E.2d 40 (Coffey v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffey v. Coffey, 391 S.E.2d 40, 326 N.C. 586, 1990 N.C. LEXIS 234 (N.C. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action by a parent against her child for personal injuries received while she was a passenger in an automobile operated by the child. At the time of the accident the child was an unemancipated minor, but at the time of suit he had reached his majority. The Court of Appeals in a reasoned opinion by Judge Greene, concurred in by Judges Arnold and Lewis, concluded that the doctrine of parent-child immunity barred the suit and affirmed summary judgment entered for defendant in the Superior Court.1

After carefully considering the briefs and arguments of counsel, we have determined that we improvidently allowed plaintiff’s petition for further review.

Discretionary review improvidently allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ludemann v. BRADFORD CLINIC, INC.
652 S.E.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Walker v. Walker
546 S.E.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Delta Environmental Consultants of North Carolina, Inc. v. Wysong & Miles Co.
510 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Strader v. Sunstates Corp.
500 S.E.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1998)
Keith v. Northern Hospital District
499 S.E.2d 200 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1998)
House Healers Restorations, Inc. v. Ball
437 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
IRT Property Co. v. Papagayo, Inc.
435 S.E.2d 565 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Doe ex rel. Connolly v. Holt
418 S.E.2d 511 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1992)
Madry v. Madry
415 S.E.2d 74 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 S.E.2d 40, 326 N.C. 586, 1990 N.C. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffey-v-coffey-nc-1990.