Coffey v. Brodsky

278 A.D.2d 191, 716 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12528
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to real property, the defendant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (Bergerman, J.), dated December 3, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties is not aggrieved by the order which granted the plaintiffs motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant under the relation-back doctrine (see, Poulard v Papamihlopoulos, 254 AD2d 266). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coffey v. Brodsky, 278 A.D.2d 191, 716 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 191 (Coffey v. Brodsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yanovsky v. 833 Flatbush, LLC
66 A.D.2d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
LDV Enterprises, Inc. v. Puma
285 A.D.2d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Dery v. DeCostole Carting, Inc.
281 A.D.2d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)