Coffey v. Baker

New York Court of Appeals

Coffey v. Baker

863 N.E.2d 1020, 8 N.Y.3d 867, 831 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 186

DecidedFebruary 20, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 863 N.E.2d 1020 (Coffey v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coffey v. Baker, 863 N.E.2d 1020, 8 N.Y.3d 867, 831 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 186 (N.Y. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by plaintiffs for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the complaint against defendants Gill and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. denied. Cross motion by the Kelly defendants, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that granted the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against defendants Gill and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. denied; cross motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action with respect to the Kelly defendants within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by plaintiffs for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the complaint against defendants Gill and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. denied. Cross motion by the Kelly defendants, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that granted the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against defendants Gill and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. denied; cross motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action with respect to the Kelly defendants within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

863 N.E.2d 1020, 8 N.Y.3d 867, 831 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffey-v-baker-ny-2007.