Coffey Rigby v. Railroad Co.

60 S.E. 447, 79 S.C. 150, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 34
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 22, 1908
Docket6757
StatusPublished

This text of 60 S.E. 447 (Coffey Rigby v. Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffey Rigby v. Railroad Co., 60 S.E. 447, 79 S.C. 150, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 34 (S.C. 1908).

Opinion

February 22, 1908. The opinion of the Court was delivered by *Page 151 The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court of Common Pleas for Clarendon County for $231.64, the value of one mule short in a car-load of live stock shipped from St. Louis, Mo., to the plaintiff at Manning, S.C. interest thereon and the statutory penalty of fifty dollars. The defendant appeals solely on the ground that the penalty statute of 1903 (24 Stat. 81) is unconstitutional. The question has been settled by the case of Charles v. R.R. Co., 78 S.C. 36.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charles v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.
58 S.E. 927 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 S.E. 447, 79 S.C. 150, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffey-rigby-v-railroad-co-sc-1908.