Coffelt v. State

905 So. 2d 269, 2005 WL 1521415
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 2005
Docket2D05-1842
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 905 So. 2d 269 (Coffelt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffelt v. State, 905 So. 2d 269, 2005 WL 1521415 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

905 So.2d 269 (2005)

Brian Keith COFFELT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D05-1842.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 29, 2005.

PER CURIAM.

Brian Coffelt appeals the circuit court's denial of his pro se motion to correct sentencing error filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). *270 We reverse and remand for the circuit court, under the authority of Lee v. State, 779 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), to strike the pro se motion as unauthorized since Coffelt at the time he filed the rule 3.800(b)(2) motion was and currently still is represented by appointed counsel in the pending direct appeal of the sentence being challenged by the motion.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colandro Dewayne Peters v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Gedehomme v. State
160 So. 3d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Bizzell v. State
912 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 So. 2d 269, 2005 WL 1521415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffelt-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.