Coffee v. State

194 S.W.2d 778, 1946 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1050

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coffee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Tex. Crim. 71 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 29, 1946·No. No. 23366·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the failure to stop and render aid. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all other procedural matters appear to he regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the failure to stop and render aid. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all other procedural matters appear to he regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Coffee v. State, 194 S.W.2d 778, 1946 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1050 (Tex. 1946).

Pincite

194 S.W.2d 778 (Coffee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.